Let me start by saying that listening to Audible content using an iPod and not fiddling with conversion to CD‘s and then to MP3‘s is the way to go. Whether I should blame iTunes or Nero or both, I’m not sure. I ended up with skipping tracks and content that would end in mid-sentence. Transferring the two large files to the iPod was a much more pleasant and seamless experience. Paper is certainly a simpler medium… Last comment about the audio book: the narrator, Brian Emerson, does a reasonable job but seems to have difficulty in providing the necessary intonation when the end of a sentence approaches.
Confessions of an economic hitman is John Perkins‘ firsthand account of his life and career. Initially starting out as a volunteer worker in South America, he was soon employed as an economist for Chas. T. Main. The company provided a variety of engineering services, foremost among them the development of power plants. Perkins’ role was to forecast economic growth based on what he perceived the power requirements of third-world countries would be. Based on the assumptions, plans for construction of infrastructure were provided to those countries along with the requisite financing. It is Perkins‘ assertion that his role as an economic hitman (EHM) ensured the indebtedness of these countries to the USA and its large corporations and government. Oil is the most obvious resource the US is after, and the reader follows Perkins‘ trail from South America to the Middle-East and Asia.
I found the book quite fascinating, especially the insight provided regarding historic events, such as the rise of the Ayatullah Khomeini, construction of the Panama Canal and the dealings of Bush and company. My favourite factoid: the mention of Arbusto, a small oil company set up by George W Bush. Arbusto is the Spanish word for bush
Where the necessary leverage could not be brought to bear by the EHM’s, the US government would send in CIA jackals to assassinate leaders. Perkins mentions both Omar Torrijos (president of Panama) and Jaime Roldós Aguilera (president of Ecuador) whose deaths are speculated to have been caused to further a sinister cause. According to Perkins, military intervention is the final move used by the US government. Iraq and Afghanistan are but two examples, with the invasion of Panama in 1989 being another.
There are some who consider Perkins to be embroiled in a conspiracy theory. I guess each statement has a counter argument, as with all things in life. In principle, I consider Perkins account the be honest. I don’t believe he has anything to gain by making up wild accusations. You may want to read (or listen to) the book to make up your own mind